Terrifying Celebrity Wax Sculptures You Can't Unsee

Even on the best of days, celebrity wax sculptures are a little bit unnerving — and when they go wrong, they go horribly wrong. Despite the intense amount of work involved in making a wax figure  — "about 350 hours," according to The Washington Post — the fruit of this labor occasionally turns out rather rotten.

Don't believe us? We're talking about a Britney Spears sculpture with animatronic breasts, and a shirtless, shiny Justin Bieber replica with unblinking, come-hither eyes. That's to say nothing of the sacrilegious fever dream starring wax figures of David and Victoria Beckham — a spectacle that managed to outrage the Vatican.

Over the years, these eerie wax replicas have riled social media, spooked magazine editors, and presumably startled innumerable tourists. And now it's time to experience the horror yourself. You can't run. You can't hide. All you can do is stare helplessly at these terrifying celebrity wax sculptures — while they stare back at you.

Welcome to Nicki Swift's House of Wack. You can never go home again.

It's not Britney, b****h. In May 2006, Madame Tussauds New York launched a no-holds-barred attack on the senses, and we still haven't fully recovered. According to TMZ, this Britney Spears wax sculpture was ostensibly part of a "grassroots movement" to "Bring Back Britney," who was going through a rough patch at the time. (According to CBS News, 2006 was the year Spears "[filed] for divorce from Kevin Federline" and was voted "worst celebrity dog owner" by The Hollywood Dog and The New York Dog.)

Christened "Britney Spears 2000," the slinky, pole-dancing wax likeness was intended to be a throwback to Spears' better days. Janine DiGioacchino, the former General Manager of Madame Tussauds New York, explained that "Britney's public pop star persona has taken a hit, and we're thrilled to spearhead a movement to help Britney regain her former glory" (per City Guide NY). It's an odd thing to say considering the creative decisions on display. Press materials (per TMZ) assured that the Britney figure was "sexy and scantily clad with heaving breasts," which "feature animatronic engineering that move them up and down." No wonder the sculpture's "facial expression read more 'this is terrifying' than 'this is fun'" (per MTV).

We doubt the waxwork helped lift the pop star out of her funk, but many oglers were thrilled, with one gentleman passionately telling Reuters: "Yeah, it looks a lot like her. I especially like the breathing in her chest and all that. That's hot." 

Do you see what we see? In December 2004, NBC News reported that Madame Tussauds London staged "a daring version of the Christmas Nativity scene" starring a wax likeness of David Beckham as Joseph and his wife Victoria as Mary. The move understandably raised a number of pious eyebrows. A Vatican spokesperson wasted no time condemning the spectacle, telling Reuters in Rome (per NBC News): "This is worse than bad taste. It is cheap. You cannot use contemporary personalities as the central figures in the Nativity." 

Evidently, you can. Evidently, you do. And the wax Beckhams certainly weren't the only peculiar detail in this particular spectacular. NBC News reported that the sacrilegious scene was rounded out by wax sculptures of talk show host Graham Norton, then-President George W. Bush, and then-Prime Minister Tony Blair, each of whom were cast as one of the three wisemen. (No word on how "incense, gold, and myrrh" duties were allocated.) Meanwhile, a wax statue in the likeness of pop star Kylie Minogue portrayed a majestic angel, who watched over the stately tableau from on high.

Shortly after the story broke, the Independent reported that the display was unceremoniously "closed" following a "vandal attack." Reportedly, "a man in his twenties" was seen "repeatedly punching the waxwork figures and escaping into the street." Overcome with sorrow, the Victoria Beckham statue presumably wept.

File under He's Just Not That Into You: In January 2012, Nicolas Cage was photographed rubbing elbows with his wax figure at the Musée Grévin, a wax museum in Paris. Of course, it takes two to tango, and numerous publications noted that this particular wax sculpture was just not having Nicolas Cage. Complex understandably found the whole spectacle "creepy." The sight of Nicolas Cage living his best possible life alongside his worst possible wax replica struck StyleCaster as "unbearably weird." Meanwhile, Gawker pointedly asked its readership: "Have you ever seen a wax figure look so fundamentally disinterested in his counterpart?"

When the story first broke, it seemed like the entire publishing industry was trying to get to the bottom of Cage's relationship with his glassy-eyed rage-doll. Both Buzzfeed and Men's Health dedicated entire features to the meet-cute, with the latter admitting: "We had to stare for a few seconds to figure out which of these was the real Nicolas Cage. It was a tough call." Perhaps oddest of all, US Weekly hyperbolically claimed that the "statue aged Cage by about 50 years," which in 2012 was akin to saying "the statue" made Nicolas Cage look 98-years-old. We wouldn't go that far — but we certainly wouldn't want to face off with this menacing wax figure in a dark alleyway. Nor in the Musée Grévin in Paris, for that matter.

What does this mean? In October 2016, a Justin Bieber wax figure was proudly "unveiled" at the Madame Tussauds London, just before the real Justin Bieber kicked off a string of concerts in the United Kingdom (per USA Today). An overzealous Madame Tussauds spokesperson effectively deconstructed the wax sculpture to the Evening Standard, laboriously explaining that "the 22-year-old singing sensation's figure is topless, showing a toned torso off to perfection." At the time, it was widely touted that the shirtless Bieber statue was sporting a "wet look," and MTV News reported that the figure was "being routinely showered with water, showing off those glistening six-pack abs."

That's not to say the Bieber wax sculpture was "being routinely showered" with praise. PopCrush called the tribute "depressing as hell," and said it looked like the statue was "staring into space, desperately searching for meaning while trapped in his eternal wax hell." The Independent noted that "Justin Bieber fans" could freely ogle the statue if they were "unable to gaze longingly at his washboard abs in real life." As grim as that is, plenty of fans took the advice to heart: The Sun reports that "Beliebers turned out in force" and "puckered up for a selfie with the statue." And now we're depressed as hell, too.

"As much as I love Madame Tussauds, I don't think I could ever go in there." That's Zac Efron, confessing his feelings about wax sculptures on The Ellen Show in May 2019. We completely understand. On April 4, 2017, this Baywatch-themed replica was unleashed upon the public, courtesy of Madame Tussauds Berlin. Clad in a body-hugging wetsuit and cradling what we'll call a "strategically-placed lifeguard buoy," the wax figure instantly sent shockwaves through the easily rattled publishing industry. Startled Elle editors offered up this Goth-tinged provocation as a headline: "Zac Efron's New Wax Figure Will Haunt Your Dreams." The magazine also observed that the aloof, black-clad sculpture gave off "a bit of a burglar aesthetic" and had "vacant blue eyes," evocatively daring its readership "not to shiver." 

Meanwhile, an InStyle writer revealed that she'd been looking forward to seeing the wax figure so she could "stare [at] that chiseled jawline and those piercing blue eyes without Zac Efron the human getting creeped out." Which, we're getting a little creeped out. Nevertheless, she didn't feel the sculpture did any justice to the actor, wondering: "Who is this weird, mustachioed imposter?" Elsewhere around the web, Yahoo noted that "the Internet" felt the sculpture looked "more like Adam Levine" than Zac Efron, and suspected this had to do with "the perfectly coifed hair or the five o'clock shadow." For whatever reason, our "perfectly coifed hair" is standing on end.

Now we know what it's like to have "no tears left to cry." In May 2019, Madame Tussauds London proudly premiered its Ariana Grande statue, announcing on Twitter that the likeness of the pop princess was based on "Classic Ari," hence the signature ponytail, floppy sweater, and knee-high boots. Well, in case you haven't already guessed, Twitter denizens were far from pleased with the results.

As Jezebel reports, Grande's fans — or "Arianators," if you must — deluged the microblogging site with rafts of hate mail, with one perturbed fellow telling Madame Tussauds London: "Y'all need to melt her face a[nd] start ove[r] because this ain't it!!" Another Twitter user saw an uncanny resemblance to the pop star's half-brother, insisting that "this is Frankie Grande in a wig." Meanwhile, another fan simply couldn't contain his disappointment: "I hate Ariana's new wax figure. It's not her face. She deserves more respect you know."

The media was hardly more charitable in its assessment. Vice provocatively suggested that "Ariana Grande's Wax Figure Is Her, Minus Pretending to Be Black." The publication even claimed the wax creation harkened back to "the younger, paler version" of Grande "before she discovered (and then appropriated) Black culture." Meanwhile, the real Ariana Grande weighed in on the wax sculpture herself, only adding to the nontroversy (per CNN). She cryptically wrote on Instagram: "I just wanna talk."

Ho ho NO. In 2018, Madame Tussauds Berlin paid a special holiday tribute to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Unfortunately, that holiday wasn't Halloween.

See, these weren't your average absolutely terrifying wax figures ... because these particular figures really moved. As in, they were actors wearing ghastly wax masks molded in the likeness of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and they were both draped in intensely ugly Christmas sweaters. (His featured sprightly reindeer bounding about; she opted for a motif of buckles, mittens, and snowflakes.) According to Page Six, the actors went through the motions of a particularly dismal Christmas morning: Photographic evidence suggests "Prince Harry" and his unmoving, ever-smiling face occasionally presented his wife with a Christmas gift, and "Markle" sometimes made a big to-do out of touching his bicep as he flexed and smiled and smiled and smiled.

Never ones to let a dreadful waxwork pass by unnoticed, Elle staffers proclaimed that the "live wax figures are seriously freaky," pointing out that "the Meghan Markle replica even wore a fake belly." Meanwhile, the Daily News called the presentation a "haunting display," while PopSugar's Entertainment Editor Quinn Keaney perfectly summed up the situation by tweeting that "these Prince Harry and Meghan Markle wax figures are what you see right before you die."

Taylor Swift drums up controversy wherever she goes, so it's no surprise that her wax replica would also cause a stir. The fact is, two totally different Tay-Tay tributes have rankling the masses in recent years — and they both come courtesy of Madame Tussauds.

First up: In 2010, Madame Tussauds New York premiered its visual paean to the "Bad Blood" singer (pictured, left), prompting NPR to declare that "Taylor Swift's wax figure is not lifelike enough to represent Taylor Swift." Pulling even less punches, NashvilleGab claimed it was "a really terrible likeness and looked more like a mall mannequin than Taylor." As The Hollywood Reporter noted, the real Swift was on hand to personally unveil the wax figure, which held "an acoustic guitar customized with Swarovski crystals" and wore "a Jenny Packham dress donated by [Swift]." Suffice to say, neither Swift nor the wax replica looked particularly happy to be there.

The attack of the clones continued in 2015, when Madame Tussauds London revealed a brand-new Taylor Swift wax figure (pictured, right). This spirited tribute to the "Shake It Off" video was similarly pooh-poohed, pompoms and all. Mashable warned its readership that "London's new wax statue of Taylor Swift is the stuff of nightmares," while Glamour cattily quipped that "Swift's new wax figure is having a bad hair day." Even Time got in on all the fun, writing: "Not a fan of the sculpture? We bet its fans would say haters gonna hate hate hate hate hate."

Why, it's a veritable "Who's Who?" While attending the premiere of Avengers: Age of Ultron in April 2015, Chris Hemsworth unwittingly came face-to-face with a wax figure created in his likeness — well, at least in theory. Though the artists at Madame Tussauds Hollywood were clearly aiming for Hemsworth as Thor, they landed somewhere south of Garth Algar from Wayne's World. Meanwhile, that leather vest and its oversized contrast buttons did no one any favors.

As we've come to expect, entertainment websites voiced their concerns in no uncertain terms. ET Online felt that "the figure has impossibly blonde hair that looks more like glam rock's take on The Rachel than it does Thor." Meanwhile, US Weekly felt like "having Hemsworth stand next to his Thor wax figure only makes matters worse." Demonstrating uncharacteristic restraint, British tabloid The Mirror diplomatically noted that the wax figure "didn't quite have the same epic feel as Marvel's Norse God." 

As for us, we've never felt more connected to a single arched eyebrow in our entire lives.

It all began innocently enough — with a wax figure in Nicki Minaj's likeness displayed in a rather compromising position at Madame Tussauds Las Vegas. In a 2015 article, E! reported that the sculpture wore "the same bikini and chains seen in [the video for Minaj's hit single] 'Anaconda.'" In a since-deleted tweet, rapper Azealia Banks didn't try to contain her contempt, writing that the figure was "bent over on all fours. ... As much as that woman has accomplished, they had to put her on all fours."

Little did she know, the grimness had just begun. As Elite Daily reports, "Visitors to the exhibit instantly began to perform lewd acts with the sculpture." Initially, the real Minaj was a good sport, reacting with emojis as fans flocked to social media to post increasingly intimate photos with the sculpture. However, the rapper remained conspicuously mum about one image... probably because it depicted a fan who was seemingly trying to impregnate the wax figure. As The Guardian reports, the photo showed "a man mounting the figure from behind and pulling its hair — the image that seems to have attracted the biggest backlash." 

The museum subsequently released a statement: "It is unfortunate that this visitor decided to behave so inappropriately and we apologize for any offense this has caused." The schoolmarmish tone rather belies the fact that the museum conjured up this puzzling peepshow in the first place.

For sheer shock value, most celebrity wax sculptures can't hold a candle to the creations of Boston's Dreamland Wax Museum. It habitually trotted out wax sculptures that were, at best, "loosely based" on celebs like quarterback Tom Brady, rapper Snoop Dogg, and what might pass for Ben Affleck in some alien dimension.

As the AP reported in 2017, "photos of the museum's life-sized wax figures [regularly inspired]... scorching ridicule [online]," and rightly so. Case in point: the above photo was intended to resemble a certain Big Little Lies actress, but things evidently took a turn. The chilling result inspired Mashable to write, "How dare anyone disrespect Nicole Kidman like this?" The staff at Starts at 60 agreed, quipping that "Kidman's new wax figure is unfortunate to say the least." The Journal Inquirer, writing either diplomatically or with profound shade, noted: "You're likely to come away with an appreciation for the craft it takes to make a semi-realistic version of Nicole Kidman in molded wax, along with new understanding for the old adage about beauty being in the eye of the beholder." For what it's worth, Michael Pelletz, Dreamland's former "vice president of sales," told the AP that he took all the "negative press" in stride, remarking that "it's absolutely been a blessing to have all of that controversy." No such thing as bad publicity, right?

According to Boston, Dreamland "shut down operations for good" in 2020.

Some wax sculptures are just born bad. Right out of the gate, the press was unnerved by this Madame Tussauds wax figure of actor Ryan Gosling, with Vogue Australia calling it "really creepy" while noting that "something's not quite right." But why did the mag find this statue "a lot more creepy than it is cute?" This apparently had everything to do with "the overly pointy mustache, a lack of visible hands, his exaggerated forehead [and] his tiny, beady eyes."

Vogue Australia was hardly alone in its abject terror. The uncanny likeness of Gosling evidently sent the entire publishing world into a tailspin, with Mashable writing that "there's something a little off about this Ryan Gosling wax figure." Its own takeaway about the sculpture, which premiered at the Madame Tussauds in Berlin back in 2017, was that "it looks just like Ryan Gosling. And somehow, simultaneously, it does not." Meanwhile, GQ had its own hot take: "Those balloons that spell #dreamdate behind him are a nice touch, if a little creepy." A scribe at Canada's artlessly-named FASHION Magazine also chimed in, writing that "his gorgeous blue eyes are disturbing AF, and... his 'stache/goatee makes us want to run!" Though it goes without saying, social media went bananas, with one commentator tweeting: "There's something so disturbing about this [wax figure...] like it's going to come alive and eat you when you turn your back." 

This celebrity wax sculpture caused a serious rumpus among the Kardashian-Jenner clan. In December 2019, A-list guests attending a dinner party at Kris Jenner's home were given quite the startle: According to People, a wholly lifelike replica of Jenner dressed smartly in "a tuxedo modeled after [Jenner's] favorite Dolce and Gabbana suit" was "tucked beside a bar in her lounge." Guests like John Legend and Chrissy Teigen were understandably spooked, with Jenner sagely noting: "Okay, Chrissy is obsessed with me. She's staring at it like it's me, but it's not even me." Meanwhile, Kim Kardashian remarked: "This is her exact hairline. I can't even tell you how creepy and amazing this is." 

You might be wondering where the sculpture came from. People reports that "the Hollywood Wax Museum specifically made the figure for [Jenner]." Let it be known that news of the ghoulish gift made it all the way to Australia's capital, with Perth Now running with the headline: "Kris Jenner shocks family with creepy wax sculpture of herself in home." The website quotes Kardashian as saying, "I literally knew I was coming up here, and I still got startled seeing this." Meanwhile, Jenner posted an Instagram story in which she jokingly told Kardashian: "It's so you can visit with me and not have to listen to me talk to you." If you're feeling brave, you can see the sculpture up close and personal on Kardashian's Instagram page. 

Madame Tussauds has reportedly been doing a brisk business in bad Beyoncé wax sculptures for over a decade. In fact, there are enough examples to fill an entire slideshow, as evidenced by a pictorial essay in Paper titled "Bad Wax Figures of Beyoncé: A History." The image above is an iteration that Paper christened the "drunk girl at the club version of Beyoncé," in which faux-Bey's "panties are exposed for hordes of camera-toting tourists to see." As Getty Images notes, the sculpture can be seen canoodling here with "Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles City Council President and 13th District City Councilman," and an up-for-anything wax sculpture of Jamie Foxx. No wonder W magazine named this impostor one of "the most cursed celebrity wax figures of all time."

There have been plenty of other problematic examples over the years. As The Washington Post reported in July 2017, Madame Tussauds frantically restyled "Beyoncé's wax figure" because it "looked too white to some." According to ET, "Beyoncé fans called out the figure for looking more like Mariah Carey, Shakira, Lindsay Lohan or even Kate Hudson." The shifty shutterbugs at TMZ noted: "Whoever she looks like, she's white as hell." The controversy even inspired its own hashtag "#TussaudsSoWhite," with one such tweet speculating that "this is Becky with the good hair.... Not Beyonce."

"Jimmy Kimmel's Wax Figure Is Absolutely Terrifying." So goes the grabby headline of a December 2019 E! article, which goes on to detail the travails of the late night host's wax figure, conjured up by Madame Tussauds Hollywood. To fully exploit the grand unveiling of the statue, Kimmel incorporated the artwork into a prankish bit that found him terrorizing coworkers by placing the statue in unexpected corners of the studio: near the elevator, behind the receptionist's desk, on and on. As E! observes, "Several employees had to [do] a double take... and of course, there were tons of gasps and screams." 

The only thing more unsettling than a Jimmy Kimmel wax double is Kimmel impersonating a Kimmel wax double: His cousin and coworker Micki Marseglia learned this the hard way when stumbling into "the Guest Dressing Room," according to E!. There, she found Kimmel "frozen" in place and assuming the same stance as the wax figure in question. As she attempted to take a selfie with the figure, Kimmel abruptly turned his head, causing her to fearfully fall to the floor, hurdling her phone across the room, and shouting, "That is so messed up!" It's a great bit, concluded with cousin Micki meeting the real wax figure onstage (shown above), and one that so deftly carries on the tradition of talk show hosts intimidating their subordinates. 

In 2018, New York's Madame Tussauds unveiled a new wax figure of Melania Trump, which stood next to a likeness of husband Donald Trump; a figure that had been taking up considerable space at the museum since 2017. As Popsugar reports, the ceremony was presided over by Sean Spicer, former White House Press Secretary and forever Dancing with the Stars punchline. 

Worryingly, the wax figure was "part of a new Madame Tussauds experience called 'Give Melania a Voice,'" according to Popsugar. This let people "publish tweets on Melania's behalf" by posting their requests to a dedicated Twitter account. People clearly had misgivings about the prospect of this soulless, dead-eyed animatronic puppet suddenly being able to speak in coherent sentences, but they also had some inspired ideas about what she should say. As Cosmopolitan reports, "Some suggestions ... were 'help' and 'save me'" and 'get me out of here.'"

According to Glamour, reactions on social media were predictably divided: "Some members of the Twittersphere commented online that the wax figure is a dead ringer for the FLOTUS, while others say it looks literally nothing like her." But no one could argue that the pair of statues looked particularly chummy, let alone supposedly married to one another. As one Twitter denizen observed, "She won't even hold his hand as a wax figure." Isn't it uncanny?

Why would anyone have a problem with this wax sculpture of rapper Sean Combs? Diddy himself was clearly over the moon when attending the 2009 unveiling at Madame Tussauds New York. Even Vulture keenly noted that it "might be one of the only celebrity wax statues that didn't immediately fill the human soul with a terrible sense of uncanny valley."

Well, one impulsive onlooker evidently disagreed. As NBC New York reports, a deeply discontented museum visitor was evidently roused to anger at the sheer sight of the statue in 2019, violently pushing the likeness to the ground and sending its head clear off its neck. The NYPD soberly told NBC that "the man then stomped on the head." As of press time, the suspect is still at large.

Word traveled fast and the news was picked up by numerous outlets, with the Chicago Tribune reporting that the "wax replica ... was decapitated" and Stereogum revealing that "investigators were continuing... to look for a suspect in the strange episode." CBS New York made a point to mention that "there's no known motive." Meanwhile, Fox News felt very strongly that the man had "a vendetta against [Combs and] took his frustration out on the rapper's wax figure," a stunt that reportedly "caused an estimated $300,000 worth of damage." Photos of the crime scene are available on YouTube if you must look, but we should warn you that the images are extremely graphic.